Monday, November 10, 2008

What Obama Means for Video Gamers

Thanks to websites such as GamePolitics, gamers are much more involved in issues that affect their rights and their ability to game than ever before.

Couple that with Sen. Obama's targeted ad campaign in Burnout Paradise, and his campaign to get the youth to vote and you would think we would be more involved than ever.

But now it is as if the hypnotist snapped his fingers, and we are all of the sudden standing on a chair with our pants down cluckling like a chicken, and start seeing the reality.

That reality is that Senator Obama may have questionable views when it comes to video games. One of his opponents during primary season was the infamous Hillary Clinton, another Democrat who has done everything in her power to block games such as GTA IV and Manhunt from ever seeing the light of day.

Gamers seem to also have forgotten that the same man also generalized them all as underachievers.

The typical gamer demographic (18-25 or so) is unfortunately prone to voter apathy, but when confronted about their rights could be one of the biggest special interest groups out there. We should be more involved, we should care more about our rights, and make sure that they are not infringed.

In response to: The NY Times

Thursday, November 6, 2008

And so it begins...

2) Russia announces it is putting missiles on EU border...

3) Democratic Senator Schumer compared conservative talk radio to porn as a justification for supporting the Fairness Doctrine...

4) The stock market that was supposed to stabilize as soon as the election was decided dropped more than it had ever dropped after an election ...

5) Palestinians (or some other Islamic group) in Gaza fired 40 rockets into Israel which led to Israel launching an airstrike into Gaza...

And so It begins.

Reposted from here

Wednesday, November 5, 2008

The morning after...

I sit here, recollecting the events of last night.

A lot of heated things were said by conservatives- a lot of people, both young and old, are upset with last night's decision. It is understandable.

Here is what we are looking at.

Obama gets sworn in.
During his term he has the ability to select 2 Supreme Court Justices (who will all be to the like of Ruth Bader Ginsburg). These two new justices will easily be approved by the democratic majority congress (Though thank God they haven't hit the filibuster proof majority yet).

The Democrats will then have a majority in all 3 branches of Government. (so much for checks and balances - our forefathers would be proud of us!)

With a uniform legislative branch, and with no threat of veto from the Executive branch we are going to see liberal legislation after liberal legislation passed.

The new Supreme Court is going to start legislating from the bench- overruling many crucial cases, reaffirming Roe v. Wade, destroying everything Justices Roberts Scalia, and Thomas have accomplished. We will see an unprecedented wave of judicial activism. They will overturn the recent decision in the DC Handgun ban (District of Columbia v. Heller). They are going to undermine our police and military's abilities to do their jobs effectively and efficiently.

They are going to trample on the Constitution, piss on Old Glory and effectively destroy everything our nations founding fathers created.

I'm not going as far as to say horses will start eating each other, or the world is going to end in 2012, or any of that nonsense; but we are in for a drastic change over the next 4 years.

Obama claims to have brought unity to the country- a statement which could not be further from the truth. Read a few other entries in my blog- you will see that the nation is more divided than ever. And yet - he has the gall to quote Lincoln in his victory speech.


I hope I am wrong. I pray that I am wrong.

In 2010, during the midterm elections, America will wake up and realize what they have done, and the mistake they have made. In 2010 Republicans will take back Congress and being the healing process. I only pray that it is not too late.

Tuesday, November 4, 2008

When the dust settles...

I have my passport in hand, but at the same time and as I prepare myself mentally to be an ex-patriot, I can not bring myself to leave the country that has given me everything.

Only in America- could a black socialist, who's middle name is Hussein, has known ties to terrorists, and wasn't necessarily even born in the United States (as admitted by his own grandmother) - play the naive uneducated American public, and play to the guilt of the white for something that none of them had any hand in - become president of the free world.

Only in America could a man with no military experience what-so-ever, become commander-in-chief of the largest military superpower on earth.

Wake up people - slavery ended over 150 years ago, segregation ended almost 60 years ago. The POTUS is not an affirmative action position. There is no room for on the job training.

This country is going in a different direction. When we see Virginia, North Carolina, and Florida fall to the left- we know there is a problem.

In closing, America - it isn't me. Its you.
You've changed - you are going in a direction that I fear I cannot be a part of.

To all of my like-minded friends- (mostly from Digg). It was an honor to fight beside you for the past few months. We will fight through this. We will grit out teeth. We will be dragged through this kicking and screaming- but we will come out on top. We are strong. We will prevail in the long run. Lets just hope we don't go past the point of no return.

Here's to 2012.

RIP America 1776 - 2008

Friday, October 31, 2008

The Tolerant Left

Throughout the past few days, I have been following horror stories. Not in the spirit of Halloween, but in the spirit of the upcoming election.

There are some sick people in this world, and for some reason the majority of them seem to be Obama supporting Democrats.

    "Ok…so what if next Tuesday, November 4th, we find that our hero Obama, hasn’t won? Well, given the fact that alot of niggas are gonna be at election parties (myself included), the plan is to get super throwed. The thought behind that is this…if he wins, i’ll be drunk on happiness, and if he loses, the loss won’t hurt so bad if i’m drunk. Part B of the plan is to convince a young lady to come back to the crib and watch CNN…one thing leads to another, and the next thing you know…its sunrise, I kicked ole girl out the crib, and I got a flag in my left hand…one can only hope, lol. So now, I wake up November 5th…to a whole new world, controlled by John McCombover, and i’m pissed. I go outside, and it’s like the A-Bomb hit…niggas are runnin all over the place rioting, and white people have barricaded their homes…if the crackers don’t wanna play fair, we’ll show that ass, lol.

    Now i’m not callin for rioting by any means…but a nigga will participate. Its this leather jacket that i’ve been lookin at for the longest, so either way, imma get mine, lol. Niggas will riot if Obama wins or loses, so ya’ll need to be close to ya’ll favorite stores, in order to take advantage of the situation. Stuff like this only happens so often…niggas! I was still in the eighth grade when the OJ trial went down,and Akron ain’t really the place to be when it comes to rioting, because we got like two hip hop stores, and they right down the street from one another…plus they close to the donut spot…so its not really a good idea to try to put in that work. The Rodney King incident, I was young, and that was limited to the LA area…Watts, I was still an afterthought in my daddy’s nutsack at that point, so that doesn’t count either. But if Obama loses…thats a nationwide dilemma, so be prepared! Get ya duffle bags, ski masks, wave caps, all black timbs, and black locs ready, because you can clean up. White people…I don’t know what to say to ya’ll…but don’t go to work on November 5th if you work at the following establishments, which tend to employ or serve alot of negroes…Church’s, Popeye’s, KFC, McDonald’s, Walmart, Your Local Hip-Hop Store, Any Corner Store or Walgreen’s. White people, STAY AWAY from these establishments.
    " - Promanant Black Democrat Blog

    "Will black people riot? I should hope so, I plan to. If he doesn’t win I will be in San Francisco rioting for the first time in my life and I’ll be in DC shortly thereafter. I will riot, and strike, and protest and fight until the wrong has been undone." - Promanant Democrat Blog

And who could forget the group that attacked Palin's Motorcade

We are not dealing with everyday normal Americans anymore, and we haven't been for a long time. We are dealing with fanatics. Sure there are some on both sides, but the few and far in between outbursts from the right (which have generally been benign statements, without any action) can't hold a candle to what the left has been doing.

The part that scares me the most is the tacit approval coming from the Obama Camp. The only thing he has said related to the matter was his "get in their faces" statement. One can only question whether or not this is what he meant. But the fact that he has not publicly denounced any of this is a very scary thing.

See Also: Sarah Palin is a ...

Also - please forgive the language used when quoting one of the Democrat Blogs.

Monday, October 13, 2008

Interesting and Dangerous Facts about Obama - That every Voter should Know

Obama and his Chicago Lifestyle way of running a campaign

FACT: Bill Clinton called Obama a Chicago thug for good reason.

FACT: Obama is directly linked to ACORN as their lawyer ten years ago and directly linked to Voter Fraud. Plus he wanted to hire ACORN to do get out the vote activities for his campaign. See more HERE and HERE .

FACT: Bill Clinton even accused Obama of vote rigging.

FACT: Obama’s campaign has questionable funds coming into his coffers.

FACT: Obama has contributors from foreign nations.

FACT: Obama hid $800,000 payment to ACORN through “Citizen Services, Inc.”.

FACT: Obama was given $50,000 from CODE PINK. The anti-American, anti Military left wing radical group.

FACT: Obama’s camp put a false Spanish ad with McCain and Limbaugh.

Obama and his Radical Friends and Outlook

FACT: Michelle Obama knew Bernadine Dohrn in 1988 and just a bit of background about this wack job and how she relates to the Manson Family and Why does she and Ayers matter.

FACT: Obama has close ties to Tony Rezco and maybe going to jail.

FACT: Obama lied about knowing unrepentant TERRORIST William Ayers but Obama has close ties to William Ayers and fact was on the board of directors on the Woods Fund Board and READ about one of his victims.

FACT: Obama and Ayers plan on for American School children and how Obama quotes Ayers on education.

FACT: Obama stayed in the same church for 20 years with a priest who hated America named Reverend Wright.

FACT: Louis Farrakhan has declared Barack Obama to be the Messiah.

FACT: Obama had close ties to Khalid al-Mansour who had Black Panther connections.

FACT: Obama was sympathetic with the terrorists after 9-11.

 FACT: Obama and Raila Oginga Odinga are cousins. That in itself is not bad, but he does back him even though he knows that this man is tried to stage a coup in Kenya. Why would he back such a violent, dangerous man who made a pact with the Muslims to institute sharia? What escaped mention was Odinga’s explicit plan to turn Kenya into an Al Qaeda terrorist incubator.

FACT: ACORN caused this financial crisis and Obama KNEW!

FACT: Obama could never pass a routine security background check.

Obama and his Gestapo style antics

FACT: Obama is trying to silence the National Rifle Association’s latest ad campaign using strong arm tactics by threatening them with possible legal action if they run the ads.

FACT: Obama tries to suppress FREE speech and HERE and HERE.

FACT: Obama threatened Republican donors – This should scare the hell out of you.

FACT: Obama has already started indoctrinating kids at his Camp Obama. It’s really wonderful how people like to say how Republicans are like Nazi’s, yet Democrats actually are the ones. And hear the children sing for him just like the Hitler Youth.

FACT: Obama told his supporters to get into people’s faces to get the word out.

FACT: Democrats bring up the race card whenever they fell threatened and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE and HERE

FACT: Obama has his Truth Squads ready to protect his campaign. And HERE and watch HERE.


Obama and political gain

FACT: Obama tried to stop the troops from withdrawing from Iraq for political gain and verified HERE and planned this in advance HERE  

IS Obama a US Citizen?

Obama and government waste

FACT: Obama is the 2nd highest recipient of Fannie/Freddy kickbacks $126,000.

FACT: The Democrats were responsible for sub prime mortgages and tried to hide it. This is a great primer for the whole process.

FACT: Obama NEVER signed the letter warning about Fannie/Freddie he lied yet again.

 FACT: Obama's two economic advisors are former Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac CEO's so that means if he wins those that made the mess will be back in charge.

If Obama gets into office what will he do?

FACT: Obama will sign the Freedom of Choice Act It would overturn all 300+ local, state, and federal abortion restriction laws, such as the Partial Birth Abortion Ban. Can you say wholesale butchering of babies just because they are inconvenient no matter what trimester?

FACT: He supports infanticide.

FACT: If Congress gets 60 seats in the house. They will a filibuster-proof majority .

FACT: If Obama gets into office he will reinstate the Fairness Doctrine. A direct attack against the 1st amendment folks! It has now been encompassed to INCLUDE BLOGs.

FACT: Obama’s tax plan will destroy this economy. See HERE for more info and HERE.

 FACT: Obama will gut the military and leave our country defenseless. READ more.


FACT: The Main Stream Media is wholly in the Tank for Obama and has denied the public the truth!

 Replicated from This List

Sarah Palin is a ...

From the party that preaches tolerance, embraces feminism, and hides behind freedom of speech (unless of course it offends someone, except for Sarah Palin (and potentially women everywhere)) I give you four (4) Obama supporters outside of a rally in Philadelphia wearing tee shirts stating "Sarah Palin is a C*nt"

Where is the media on this? I can only shudder to think what would happen if any white person (let alone a McCain supporter) wore a shirt that said "Obama is a ..." (and you can fill that in with anything you like- it wouldn't make a difference to them, you would be crucified regardless)

"Sexism and misogyny are ignored, but any criticism of Obama is blasphemy."

Double Standard much?

Where are the femminists on this? Where are the Hillary supporters? One cannot just sit idly by and let this go unnoticed and unpunished.

Tuesday, October 7, 2008

More Obama Ayers Connections

I think anyone considering voting for should at least do themselves the courtesy of reading about the terror his friend spread in the 1960's. Yes, Obama was eight when Bill Ayers organization did these terrible deeds. But Barack was an adult when he decided to befriend him, and keep in mind - Senator Obama's political career was launched in this man's living room.

I didn't hyperlink any of the URLs so that they can be copies and pasted easier for you all.

A Victim Speaks out:

Proof that they shared the stage at Chicago U:

A bit more about Ayers:

Obama Campaign Manager Denys Obama knew Ayer's past:

Barack and Michelle's ties to Ayers-Dohrn and the SDS:

An extensive look at the Obama Ayers connection:

I ask that this information be passed along to not only likeminded friends, but anyone who is considering voting for this man- as he surely will give his old pal a cabinet position. Do we really want a man responsible for blowing up the pentagon to have unrestricted access to government buildings?

The true measure of a man is the company he keeps, keep that in mind this November.

Update- Even CNN is starting to cover this, its not just FOX anymore:

Friday, October 3, 2008

Obama's Hitler Youth

Remind anyone of the Hitler Youth? Because that's the first thing I thought of (well, that and fat camp).

But seriously - this chilled my blood and sent shivers down my spine.

Its one thing to be singing for him:

...but having a bunch of kids dressed in pseudo-military garb behaving in such a manner - how can one not be afraid.

I'm not even going to comment much on this one- the videos speak for themselves.

Beware overly charismatic men who preach change...

Thursday, September 18, 2008

McCain not only predicted, but tried to prevent the fallout from Freddie/Fanny

McCain Warned us about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in 2005

Link directly to the bill

He stood up and spoke before Senate for a bill that might have gone a long way to helping with the problems of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, of course that bill died. But he did take a stand. Of course it would be of interest to research the bill and find out just who killed it.

Right now there's a lot of speculation about the Democrats killing it though in my research I have not come across that. It appears that McCain co sponsored this bill at first then it went on and was rolled into S. 1100 Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Reform Act of 2007, at which pint McCain is no longer in the picture on this bill.

The previous bill was:
S. 190 [109th]: Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Reform Act of 2005; link below:

Link 1

Link 2

Current status:

"This bill is in the first step in the legislative process. Introduced bills go first to committees that deliberate, investigate, and revise them before they go to general debate. The majority of bills never make it out of committee. Keep in mind that sometimes the text of one bill is incorporated into another bill, and in those cases the original bill, as it would appear here, would seem to be abandoned. [Last Updated: Aug 30, 2008]"

"Apr 12, 2007: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs."

So there you have it the full and complete history of What McCain was speaking about. I would imagine that the truth lies somewhere about where I guessed it above. More than likely the Bill's author Sen. Charles Hagel went to McCain and asked him to speak to the floor and co-sponsor this bill at which point it never went anywhere (no doubt due to changes that were needed in the bill) It was later changed and rolled into the later bill for congress S. 1100 this time without McCain on it but with the other co sponsors still on board.

I might add here that this was a Republican bill and that the Republican party at least saw there was a problem.

In related news- has shed some light on who Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were contributing to (since 1989):

1. Dodd, Christopher J (D-CT) - $133,900
2. Kerry, John (D-MA) - $111,000
3. Obama, Barack (D-IL) - $105,849
4. Clinton, Hillary (D-NY) - $75,550
5. Kanjorski, Paul E (D-PA) - $65,500

It was later brought to my attention that Senator Obama actually has surpassed Senator Kerry and now holds the number 2 spot

Wait - he has only been in the senate for a few years now- yet he managed to get to the second highest donations? Something smells fishy here.

Also related: Senator Obama didn't even know the name of AIG, the company who is currently receiving $85 Billion from the government as of late. He was very quick to criticize the bill bailing them out, but didn't know their name.

Wednesday, August 13, 2008

Obama is pro-killing newborns

From: The Dakota Voice

I had to read this article twice, because I almost didn’t believe it at first, but it’s true.

In Illinois it basically says that babies that were meant to be aborted but survive can be taken to a separate room where they are left to die.

As per Illinois law, they are issued both a Birth AND Death Certificate.

No matter what side of the political spectrum you lean on, or what your views on abortion are, this is murder.

And guess who voted against making this practice illegal when he was in office? That’s right ladies and gentlemen. You’re very own Barrack Obama.

This makes me sick.

Below are some quotes and excerpts:

Douglas Johnson, NRLC spokesman, explains: "Newly obtained documents prove that in 2003, Barack Obama, as chairman of an Illinois state Senate committee, voted down a bill to protect live-born survivors of abortion - even after the panel had amended the bill to contain verbatim language…explicitly foreclosing any impact on abortion."

Jill Stanek was a nurse at Christ Hospital in Oak Lawn, Illinois in 1999 when she discovered that babies born alive after failed abortions purposely were being left to die in the "soiled utility room," which, says Stanek, is a room where biohazard materials and soiled linens are disposed of.

"That's where nursing staff took these babies and left them to die."

She continues:

"Christ hospital - and we now know other hospitals and clinics around the country - are involved in an abortion procedure called 'induced labor abortion,'" says Stanek in the video, entitled "Kill and Destroy". In this type of abortion, she says, the abortionist inserts a medication into the birth canal of the mother and induces premature labor.

"My experience was that they [the babies] survive as short as a few minutes, to once, almost as long as an eight hour shift.

"To be clear these were living babies who were left out to die. And they were issued both birth and death certificates according to Illinois state law."

Stanek relates the story of how one night she saw a nurse bringing a baby to the soiled utility room to die, because the parents of the child did not want to hold it. The other nurse also did not have the time to hold the child. "When she told me what she was doing I couldn't bear the thought of this suffering child dying alone," says Stanek. "And so I cradled and rocked him for the forty-five minutes that he lived."

If anyone can watch the following video and still vote for this man, I fear there is no hope left for humanity, let alone America.

Again, I cannot express how much this makes me sick.

If this was being done to animals, PETA would have a field day. If this was being done to refugees, the UN and the rest of the world would have a field day.

But here in America, we are going to potentially elect a man who saw nothing wrong with this practice to the highest elected office in the free world.

There is something terribly wrong here.


Thanks to jabberwolf on Digg for looking further into this for us:

"Born Alive Infants Protection Act (BAIPA). The BAIPA was a two-paragraph bill intended to clarify that any baby who is entirely expelled from his or her mother, and who shows any signs of life, is to be regarded as a legal "person" for all federal law purposes, whether or not the baby was born during an attempted abortion.

in 2003, Barack Obama, as chairman of an Illinois state Senate committee, voted down a bill to protect live-born survivors of abortion - even after the panel had amended the bill to contain verbatim language…explicitly foreclosing any impact on abortion."

In 2002, the bill was enacted, after a "neutrality clause" was added to explicitly state that the bill expressed no judgment, in either direction, about the legal status of a human prior to live birth. The bill passed without a dissenting vote in either house of Congress.
(To view the final federal BAIPA as enacted,
Meanwhile, Barack Obama, as a member of the Illinois State Senate, actively opposed a state version of the BAIPA during three successive regular legislative sessions. His opposition to the state legislation continued into 2003 - even after NARAL had withdrawn its initial opposition to the federal bill, and after the final federal bill had been enacted in August 2002.

Obama countered this charge by claiming that he had opposed the state BAIPA because it lacked the pre-birth neutrality clause that had been added to the federal bill.


The documents prove that in March 2003, state Senator Obama, then the chairman of the Illinois state Senate Health and Human Services Committee, presided over a committee meeting in which the "neutrality clause" (copied verbatim from the federal bill) was added to the state BAIPA, with Obama voting in support of adding the revision. Yet, immediately afterwards, Obama led the committee Democrats in voting against the amended bill, and it was killed, 6-4.

So yes this is true that Obama is for letting new born babies die.

Monday, August 11, 2008

We paid for her scholarship - Michelle Obama's Racism

An email that has been going around - definately worth a read. The information within has been confirmed by Snopes.

In short - Michelle Obama has been quoted saying things like "There was no doubt in my mind that as a member of the black community, I am obligated to this community and will utilize all of my present and future resources to benefit the black community first and foremost", and using terms like "seperationist" to describe herself and other black students. She "hoped that these findings would help me conclude that despite the high degree of identification with whites as a result of the educational and occupational path that black Princeton alumni follow, the alumni would still maintain a certain level of identification with the black community. However, these findings do not support this possibility."

Does this sound like someone who wants to bring cultures and races together? I think not. Does this sound like someone who we would want as first lady in our White House? I think not.

The Original Message:

According to, Princeton was requested to put a 'restriction' on distribution of any copies of the thesis of Michelle Obama (a/k/a/ Michelle laVaughn Robinson) saying it could not be made available until November 5, 2008 but when it was published on a political website they decided they would lift the restriction.

In her senior thesis at Princeton , Michele Obama, the wife of Barack Obama stated that America was a nation founded on 'crime and hatred'. Moreover, she stated that whites in America were 'ineradicably racist'. The 1985 thesis, titled 'Princeton-Educated Blacks and the Black Community' was written under her maiden name, Michelle LaVaughn Robinson. Michelle Obama stated in her thesis that to 'Whites at Princeton , it often seems as if, to them, she will always be Black first...' However, it was reported by a fellow black classmate, 'If those 'Whites at Princeton ' really saw Michelle as one who always would 'be Black first,' it seems that she gave them that impression'.

Most alarming is Michele Obama's use of the terms 'separationist' and 'integrationist' when describing the views of black people. Mrs. Obama clearly identifies herself with a 'separationist' view of race. 'By actually working with the Black lower class or within their communities as a result of their ideologies, a separationist may better understand the desperation
of their situation and feel more hopeless about a resolution as opposed to an integrationist who is ignorant to their plight.' Obama writes that the path she chose by attending Princeton would likely lead to her 'further integration and/or assimilation into a white cultural and social structure that will only allow me to remain on the periphery of society; never becoming a full

Michele Obama clearly has a chip on her shoulder. Not only does she see separate black and white societies in America , but she elevates black over white in her world.

Here is another passage that is uncomfortable and ominous in meaning: 'There was no doubt in my mind that as a member of the black community, I am obligated to this community and will utilize all of my present and future resources to benefit the black community first and foremost.'

What is Michelle Obama planning to do with her future resources if she's first lady that will elevate black over white in America? The following passage appears to be a call to arms for affirmative action policies that could be the hallmark of an Obama administration. 'Predominately white universities like Princeton are socially and academically designed to cater to the needs of the white students comprising the bulk of their enrollments.'

The conclusion of her thesis is alarming. Michelle Obama's poll of black alumni concludes that other black students at Princeton do not share her obsession with blackness. But rather than celebrate, she is horrified that black alumni identify with our common American culture more than they value the color of their skin. 'I hoped that these findings would help me conclude that despite the high degree of
identification with whites as a result of the educational and occupational path that black Princeton alumni follow, the alumni would still maintain a certain level of identification with the black community. However, these findings do not support this possibility.'

Is it no wonder that most black alumni ignored her racist questionnaire? Only 89 students responded out of 400 who were asked for input. Michelle Obama does not look into a crowd of Obama supporters and see Americans. She sees black people and white people eternally conflicted with one another. The thesis provides a trove of Mrs. Obama's thoughts and world view seen through a race-based prism. This is a very divisive view for a potential first lady that would do untold damage to race relations in this country in a Barack Obama administration.

Michelle Obama's intellectually refined racism should give all Americans pause for deep concern. Now maybe she's changed, but she sure sounds like someone with an axe to grind with America . Will the press let Michelle get a free pass over her obviously racist comment about American whites? I am sure that it will.

Tuesday, August 5, 2008

Obama's Experience

"He has only been a Senator for 18 months. But with all the recesses, four day weekends, campaigning and absences, Obama has only spent about 6 weeks of workdays on the Senate floor as one of the most junior Senators. Most of his votes, about 80% when he was not absent, have been "present" or "abstain". He also chairs a committee that has never met because the chairman has never called a meeting. As a trial lawyer he only tried 14 cases in court - and minor ones at that. As a "community organizer" his major cause was getting the asbestos out of a housing project. After 2 years of trying the asbestos was still there when he left and is still there even now that he is a Senator and presumably has some pull to get things done.

That's it. His entire real world work resume. 6 weeks work in the Senate with nothing to show for it. Two years as a lawyer and only 14 minor trials. And two years as a "community organizer" with nothing accomplished."

Let's see what we have on McCain:

He was elected to the House of Representatives in 1982, and then the Senate in '86, several decades prior to Obama. McCain also has several years of not only military service, but military leadership under his belt, to which he was awarded the Silver Star, Bronze Star, Legion of Merit, Purple Heart, and the Distinguished Flying Cross. Obama has not served his country overseas, and most certainly did not lose several years of his life away from his family and country while doing so.

Based solely on experience and merit - How can anyone still support Obama?

Shall we look to the voting record then?

Here is a sample - Source

Voting Record - Missed Votes
These representatives have the highest percentage of missed votes. (View All Representatives)
Missed Votes Representative
50% (231) Del. Eni Faleomavaega [D-AS] since Feb 8, 2007
33% (153) Res.Com. Luis Fortuño [R-PR] since Feb 8, 2007
26% (120) Del. Madeleine Bordallo [D-GU] since Feb 8, 2007
25% (82) Rep. Jackie Speier [D-CA] since Apr 10, 2008
23% (287) Sen. Barack Obama [D-IL] since Jan 6, 2005
22% (960) Rep. Jo Ann Davis [R-VA] since Jan 3, 2001
19% (1584) Rep. Barbara Cubin [R-WY] since Jan 4, 1995
18% (427) Rep. Bobby Jindal [R-LA] since Jan 4, 2005
18% (719) Sen. John McCain [R-AZ] since Feb 4, 1993
14% (1000) Rep. Julia Carson [D-IN] since Jan 21, 1997
14% (585) Sen. John Kerry [D-MA] since Feb 4, 1993
13% (1252) Rep. Donald Young [R-AK] since Jan 5, 1993
13% (1250) Rep. Bobby Rush [D-IL] since Jan 5, 1993
12% (54) Del. Donna Christensen [D-VI] since Feb 8, 2007

23% (287) Sen. Barack Obama [D-IL] since Jan 6, 2005 Vs.
18% (719) Sen. John McCain [R-AZ] since Feb 4, 1993

18% over the past 15 years compared to 23% over the past 3. Who seems to be actually doing their job?

Tuesday, July 29, 2008

What America Needs Now, and Needed 7 Years Ago

Something I posted on a forum I frequent- It was in regards to some 12 - 22 year olds (yes that wide of an age range) clamoring about the state of America, and how it is all Bush's fault, and how "the light will come this November" (yes, someone actually said that.)

I felt the need to write back, and I just kept writing. It may not be all that well thought out, it may not flow, but hey - neither does my thought process.

When the Obamabots and Bush haters are finished jerking each-other off at the mere thought of November, perhaps a real point or two can see some light.
(oh, and excuse my vulgarity)

The America Vs. Rome is a good point to bring up, but I fear that the two are apples and oranges and cannot truly be compared.

What we need to focus on is very simple, keeping our citizens safe.

September 11th, 2001 saw one of the most brutal attacks on American soil since Pearl Harbor. In an effort to preserve our union and keep our nation safe, many steps have been made (in the right direction) not only to prevent future attacks, but also to punish those responsible.

If you would all please take note of the simple fact that there hasn't been an attack on American soil since 9/11. Obviously something is being done right.

We have thwarted several terror plots since then, and we have kept American citizens safe. Yet "citizens" actually have the gall to criticize the government, and even threaten them with talks of overthrowing and impeachment.

These "citizens" seem to forget that pretty much everything that the current administration does has to be ratified by their beloved democrat controlled Congress. They also seem to forget that Congress also has the power to vote down with a simple or 2/3 majority (I forget which at the current moment, forgive me), any of these issues that they seem to have a problem with.

These are the people who are more concerned with the rights of criminals, terrorists, and people who downright want to destroy us, than they are with keeping America safe.

During the Cold War they would be deported, or arrested. During the late 1700s- early 1800s, they would be tried for treason under the Alien and Sedition Acts.

These are the people who will burn our flag, one of the most sacred symbols of freedom, and embrace a presidential candidate who refuses to wear it, salute it, or pledge allegiance to it.

They hide behind their freedoms, but they see no problem with ripping down the government that protects it. They spit on the soldiers who fight to defend it, and they cry oppression whenever it is remotely taken away.

I bring to the attention of the forum United States Code Title 50, Chapter 3, § 21, which is still in effect to this day.

Whenever there is a declared war between the United States and any foreign nation or government, or any invasion or predatory incursion is perpetrated, attempted or threatened against the territory of the United States by any foreign nation or government, and the President makes public proclamation of the event, all natives, citizens, denizens, or subjects of the hostile nation or government, being of the age of fourteen years and upward, who shall be within the United States and not actually naturalized, shall be liable to be apprehended, restrained, secured, and removed as alien enemies.

0847, September 11th, 2001 this Code should have been enacted to the fullest extent. We should have then began deporting anyone who was here on a Student Visa, anyone who was here illegally and not a citizen, and perhaps even as far as to those who possessed dual citizenship with any hostile nations. At the same time, our borders should have been closed. We should have been completely isolated.

All of those above outlined actions would be 100% legal as per US Code Title 50, Chapter 3, § 21, yet the same people I spoke of earlier would be clamoring and crying out against such an action.

It is for your protection, it is for your freedom, it is because you don't know any better.

I love how the average American citizen (mostly college students) feel like they know more than analysts with actual real world experience (including in times of war), how they feel that they know what is right for the nation, compared to legions of Generals, Analysts, Intelligence Officers, as well as countless other leaders.

Sir Winston Churchill once said that "the best argument against democracy is a 5 minute conversation with the average voter" (slightly paraphrased), and I couldn't agree with that more.

So you all can worry about health care, social security, gay rights, abortion rights, legalization of marijuana, and things of that nature, because when we ultimately meet our demise sometime in the next 4 years because the terrorists and hostile nations of the world exploit that fact and destroy us; it isn't going to matter anyway.

"Unconventional wars are won by unconventional means" and likewise "Unpopular wars are won by unpopular means"

It is unfortunate that some "innocents" may die, but that is the choice that the enemy has made when they chose to hide among them for protection, and use them as cover for their tactics. I hate to be cliche, but in order to make an omelet, you need to break a few eggs. War is hell, there is no denying that.

We need to use their tactics if we want to beat them.

We aren't able to use their tactics here in America. Just look at the backlash from the "torturing" that "occurred" at GITMO. Look at what happened after 'Nam. Our boys came home to be spat on and called baby killers and condemned by the American public. We are not allowed to use their tactics because of the views of the American public, a few million people who for the most part have never seen combat, never had to make a split second decision to save their own life and the lives of those around them, hell probably never even had to defend themselves or their loved ones. And these people unfortunately have the power to dictate how our men and women overseas are to fight the enemy.

It is for that reason that I hold no respect for them. The funny thing about public opinion - if you are opposing it, chances are you doing the right thing. (brings me back to my point about the uneducated American public vs. military and political leaders and analysts)

Unfortunately, those who actually have the power to make decisions are too afraid of the public outcry to make these unpopular decisions and methods.

If our enemy is going to give a 12 year old an AK and tell him to ambush our troops, then our troops should have no qualms about shooting a 12 year old, and the "Starbucks Generals" (as I have dubbed them) should have no right to criticize. When was the last time they put their life on the line defending this nation?

Our enemy will not discriminate based on age, gender, race, religion, etc... neither should we. That is the first step in winning any conflict, that is a step in the direction of using their tactics.

War is not pretty, war is not supposed to be. War is the most primal form of conflict between two beings. Our enemy has only one thing in mind, and that is destroying us at all costs, including their lives, and the lives of innocents (because that is who they are after).

Wednesday, July 9, 2008

110th Congressional Approval Rating Falls to Single Digits

Rasmussen Reports - Congressional Performance

For the first time ever, in recorded history, the US Congress has fallen to a single digit approval rating. Coming in this month at a measly 9%, the 110th Congress has been doing the worst job in the history of all 110 Congressional congregations.

Not only has the approval rating fallen, but the percentage of American voters who say Congress is doing a Poor job has risen to the majority (at 52%).

Can they truly blame Bush for everything still? Not really, but they sure as hell will try. Meanwhile if you look to the facts - Bush has accomplished the majority of things he promised to do during his presidency. Congress has accomplished none of theirs. They have made little to no effort to do what they spend the majority of their time "discussing" - how to pull us out of Iraq.

Since this congress took control in 2006:

  • Gas Prices have more than doubled and risen to over $4 a gallon
  • Our Troops are still overseas in an "unconstitutional war" (according to them)
  • The housing crisis is still in full effect
  • Illegal immigration is still a huge problem

While Bush was in power:

There has not been a single terrorist attack on American soil since September 11th, 2001

I think America has a deluded sense of who is doing something right and who is doing something wrong, but clearly given this month's approval rating they are finally wising up.

Tuesday, July 8, 2008

Obama: Jews are kikes, blacks are n-bomb

New Yorker Article On Obama

2nd Page, 2nd Paragraph

He went to Columbia University, and liked New York, but he found the city’s racial tension inescapable. It “flowed freely,” he wrote in his memoir—“not just out on the streets but in the stalls of Columbia’s bathrooms as well, where, no matter how many times the administration tried to paint them over, the walls remained scratched with blunt correspondence between niggers and kikes. It was as if all middle ground had collapsed.”

Only a totally blinded Obamabot would claim that this is "taken out of context". Regardless of the context, we generally hold our future presidents to be a little more classy than to use words such as those. Would it have been a stretch just to say Jews and Blacks?

Also to those of you who are ever so quick to claim the website is slanted - news flash - I just cited the original article from The New Yorker which really isn't all that conservative.

If this is the hope and change Obama is calling for then I think he can count out a lot of his potential supporters, and I think it is ironic how they can claim he is their new messiah basically and will stand behind him while he has made these kind of remarks, but will chastise and march against any other person (not even candidate) who dares utter such words.

I can only hope that this gets out there a little bit more so that there is a chance that Obama loses the Jewish vote because they too can finally see him for what he really is - an unpatriotic empty suit who refuses to salute or even pledge allegiance to the flag and is really only out there for himself, with an unpatriotic wife who was never proud of her country until they voted in favor of her husband. Are these really the kinds of people we want in the White House?

Monday, June 23, 2008

Obama voted NOT to fix the Levees in Iowa

Politico - Attacking on Iowa

“Barack Obama opposed and voted against the bipartisan effort by John McCain, Russ Feingold and Claire McCaskill to assure that lifesaving levees like those that so tragically failed in Iowa and Missouri are given the highest priority and fixed first. It is beyond the pale that Barack Obama would attack John McCain for actually trying to fix the problem and change the way Washington works. Barack Obama’s willingness to continue the status quo pork-barrel politics in Washington, and then engage in political attacks that entirely disregard the facts, once again fundamentally shows that he’s nothing more than a typical politician.”

An example of partisan politics at its best (worst). In a sheer effort to disagree with McCain just because he is McCain - Senator Barack Obama has voted against a Bipartisan effort put forth by McCain (R), Feingold (D), and McCaskill (D) to help repair lifesaving levees in light of the recent tragedy that has struck the Midwest. In a Florida speech yesterday - Obama disregarded the action taken by McCain, expressed his sympathies to the families of the victims, and then proceeded to call McCain out on some economic issues, and then bash the current administration as being "the most fiscally irresponsible administration in modern times". That's great Obama - too bad you aren't running against Bush, so how about you stop criticizing this administration and start going into some detail of how exactly you are "going to do things differently", because the American people have heard that all before - and unless you can actually provide some solid evidence to backup these promises you truly are "nothing more than a typical politician".

McCain is actually taking action with the crisis at hand - yet all of the left can't get away from the "He's a Bush Clone" propaganda, and that is an insult to other forms of semi-reputable propaganda everywhere. You clamored and whined when Bush "didn't do anything" after Katrina. You labeled him a racist, you claimed he didn't care about brown people. And now that McCain is actually doing something about another disaster that has struck the nation, you still can't come past the whole "Bush Clone, 4 more years of the same thing" stigma. Since your savior Obama has done so much to help this situation, I can totally understand.
You would think, with the area that is hurting the most now being so close to Obama's district that he would feel inclined to take action; not only as a politician looking for votes, but as a human being who is almost hit at home with this tragedy (pork barrel legislation anyone?). Instead what does he do? He tries to vote down a course of action that is going to the floor to help the situation. way to help out your fellow countrymen there BHO.

I'm not going to go as far as to say that this is his personal revenge for Bush's "non-action" in New Orleans, but it does make one think.

You all might go back to a previous Bipartisan bill put forth by McCain and Feingold - the McCain/Feingold Campaign Finance Reform Act, something that went over quite well and is still in practice today.

To close - Obama claims he will help unite the two parties and collaborate many bipartisan efforts - clearly this is not one of them. How can he hope to unite two parties when he is having trouble uniting the Democrats alone?

Friday, June 20, 2008

Too Smart to be a Police Officer?

I'm going to be brief on this one with a flat out WHAT THE FUCK.

I could do into a long tirade about affirmative action right now, but I think my above statement sums it up. Also - Does Affirmative Action even apply to stupid people?

New Haven basically has just indirectly said "We don't want smart cops".

How Going Green has made me a Better Driver

How Going Green has made me a better driver

Or Why going green can save you some green.

I used to be the typical left lane driver. I was that asshole passing you on the highway while you were driving the speed limit, or even faster, in my little sports car listening to my music loudly with my nice sunglasses on. Hell I could even be considered a yuppie by some standards. I used to pride myself on being able to control my car effectively at high speeds, careening through curves like it was the Indy 500. But not anymore.

I never read into any of this “Go Green” propaganda. I am not a hippie, nor a Gore-supporter, or even an environmentalist in any way shape or form; I’m not going to lie to you that I lean right on almost every issue. If that stops you from reading my article so be it, but you would do well listening to what I have to say. My eyes have been opened to a “greener” way of life.

I always advocated alternate energy sources, even from back to primary and secondary school. I had done several reports, projects, and presentations on the benefits of Solar, Hydro-Electric, and Wind power. It fascinated me – how something so simple and pure as the sun, water, and wind, were never harnessed to their full potential, and are virtually infinite, whereas fossil fuels are finite.

Regardless of your political affiliation or creed, we can all agree on one thing: Everyone likes money. And after doing a little research I have compiled various ways you can alter your habits (mostly driving) to save yourself a little cash, and do something good for the environment by conserving.

The biggest, and most prominent, as well as the easiest change to make, is very simple.

    Take your foot off the accelerator.

A car engine, regardless of the number of cylinders, is most efficient in the 50-60 MPH range. Studies show that you lose upwards of 30% efficiency as you surpass that mark and hit the higher speeds. The easiest way to combat this (specifically on the highway) is just simply stay out of the fast lane. Abide by the speed limit – stay around 55 mph and you will certainly improve your mpg. I commute about 20 miles each way every day, sometimes even more when I head to school for night classes, and I was able to significantly increase my mpg in my little V4 Celica (which already does pretty well). I also noticed that those extra 10 or so MPH only decreased my commute time by a few minutes, hardly noticeable when you think about it.

Coasting is another good way to stop burning excess fuel. I am not saying to go back to the early days and gain all of your speed from traveling down hill, but it would serve you well to not use your accelerator while you travel down hill. You would be surprised as to how much you can travel without even touching the accelerator. As long as you are paying attention and make sure that you watch to stay above 25/35 mph (depending on the zone).

Inching, as opposed to gassing your way up a few car lengths when waiting at a stoplight, is a good way to save on gas, as well as take it easy on your brakes.

I would go into advanced techniques, such as riding the slip-stream behind trucks, but I wanted to keep this article as safe and as simple as possible.

Just thinking about these small things while you drive can not only increase your gas mileage and help save the environment, but also make you a better and more defensive driver. Young people should take this to heart, and for those of you who don’t fall under that category, maybe a quick refresher isn’t that bad.

A real easy, but a little more pricey way to save money on gas by increasing your MPG is obviously to purchase a more efficient and usually smaller car. However most people forget about our 2 wheeled friends - the motorcycle, or my favourite - the scooter. You can get ridiculous MPG on these little babies, but unfortunately, what they gain in that - they lack in storage capacity, top speed, and power. Some scooters aren't even highway legal - which negates traveling on longer trips with them. However if you want a little thing just for running errands or cruising around town, perhaps a scooter isn't such a bad idea. Personally - I am looking into a Honda Elite 80 or a Metropolitan. Perfect for zipping around my hometown, or even my college.

I hope that I have helped you by reading this, or if not, at least peaked your interest a little bit more.

Look here again for new upcoming articles, including ways to convert a diesel engine to take vegetable oil or bio-diesel, utilizing alternate energy sources for power, and many other ways to save some green by going green.

Sheriff Getting Heat for Doing His Job

Phoenix Sheriff Arrests Illegal Immigrants

Sounds pretty wholesome right? Evidently some people are having trouble with it. Many leftists are taking issue with the fact that this is “racial profiling” because he is going after Hispanic Mexican looking types. Yes- because we should also be looking for immigrants from Canada in Arizona. People seem to not realize that we are looking for Mexican illegal immigrants – so is it that much of a stretch that he is going after Mexicans? When a sheriff gets criticized for doing his job – it just proves how messed up the leftist citizenry is in this country.

People like that would have Sheriff Arpaio checking identification and pulling over whites and blacks as well. Hmm… that seems like a great idea, and a perfectly good way to waste countless hours, resources, and manpower.

Many are taking issue because of the fact that the constitution protects all citizens from this under the 4th Amendment and due process. They seem to totally disregard the words “all citizens” and read it as ”all citizens and people who are in this country illegally”. On a side note – I love it how we have a constitution when it so conveniently suits their views- but they fail to even read it when it conflicts with them.

People also fail to realize that it is perfectly within the sheriff or any police officer’s jurisdiction to do this. Under Terry v. Ohio 392 U.S. 1 (1968) the Supreme Court ruled in favor of what is now referred to as a “Terry Stop” or Stop and Identify Laws - which are on the books in many if not all states. You are required to be able to identify yourself to an officer at all times. This isn’t a new thing – but it is conveniently forgotten by those who oppose its practice. Also many forget the decision in Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada - in which the Supreme Court held, in a 5-4 decision, that a Nevada “stop-and-identify” law did not violate the United States Constitution.

Also - needless to say - but only those with something to hide or a reason to fear this "new" practice are the ones who should be scared and have a problem with it.

And just to close with a generic anti-immigration statement: They are living here illegally, not paying taxes, but gaining all the benefits of being a citizen without any of the hassle. I am not going to deny all the work they do, and the jobs that they take that are beneficial to the American economy, but that is outweighed by the fact that they contribute nothing fiscally back to the nation and paying their dues for all those freedoms, rights, and benefits they enjoy. It is a burden to the regular American taxpayer (specifically the middle-class), and is also a driving cause of inflation.